
By Pastor Jeff Alexander
“They received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved” (2 Thessalonians 2:10).
In his second letter to the Thessalonians, Paul rejoiced in the believers’ rapid
spiritual development that resulted in an abounding love for the brethren. In spite
of this progress, these wonderful Christians were the objects of misinformation that
threatened their continued advancement (2:1-
Paul had warned them not to let anyone deceive them. The day would come when the “man of sin” would deceive those who had not received “the love of the truth . . . that they all might be damned who believed not the truth, but had pleasure in unrighteousness” (2:10, 12).
However, lest these believers should think that they, too, had been deceived to the
damnation of their souls, Paul quickly reassured them by declaring his thanks to
God for them (2:13). He had already done that once (1:3), thanking God for their
responsive faith. Now, he thanks God for the source of their faith—their election
of God to salvation (2:13-
THE EVIDENCE OF SALVATION
The comfort for these troubled believers centered in their apprehending the truth. God had “chosen [them] to salvation,” which included “belief of the truth.” This belief placed them in the counterpart of those who had not received “the love of the truth” (2:10). This fact effectively made their response to truth a mark of the genuineness of their salvation. It should also have relieved their troubled minds and assured their anxious hearts.
Here we have a black-
Of course, the Thessalonian situation implies that true believers may be temporarily
deceived by misinformation. Therefore, we ought to be cautious of judging those,
who, for the moment, are in the throes of wrong thinking. However, this condition
should be short-
LOVE OF THE TRUTH DEFINED
The term Paul uses, translated “love” (2 Thessalonians 2:10), is the Greek word agape. The Holy Spirit chose this word to express the love which God has for His covenant people. The other Greek words for love are based on warm feelings; however, agape is defined as “an intelligent, purposeful attitude of esteem and devotion” (Donald Burdick, The Letters of John the Apostle, 177).
“In secular Greek it represented a love in which the mind analyzes and the will chooses the object to be loved. . . . Agape is a deliberate, free act that is the decision of the subject” (Burdick, 140).
Thus, to not love the truth is to willfully not choose the truth as an object of esteem and devotion. This does not mean that those thus described do not appear to be Christians or followers of God. Paul speaks of some who have a “form” of godliness but deny the power of it (2 Timothy 3:5). Not simply lacking the power of godliness, they actively refuse or neglect the power (or means) of godliness. The power of godliness is the truth. Jesus prayed, “Sanctify them through thy truth; thy word is truth” (John 17:17). It is the truth that sets men free from the power of sin and Satan’s deception (John 8:32). Therefore, Paul warns those who, being not simply ignorant of the truth, are willfully ignoring or outright rejecting the truth.
Let us be clear in this. The truth is everything God is and everything related to Him. It is an insult to the Lord Jesus Christ for a person to say he will have Christ as Savior but that he does not care to love God’s truth! There are those, who, when confronted with some difficult teaching that they have never heard before, will refuse to take the opportunity to learn whether it is true. They just would rather not know.
For example, most Christians today are not familiar with the doctrine of election
because it is so rarely taught. When it is taught, however, few are willing to give
the doctrine an open-
BLACK OR WHITE?
How can one hold Christ in esteem and devotion and not so esteem His truth? Here
is a simple proposition: One cannot be saved if he does not love Christ. “If any
man love not the Lord Jesus Christ, let him be Anathema Maranatha [condemned at the
coming of Christ]” (1 Corinthians 16:22; see also Ephesians 6:24). The same proposition
holds for the love of the truth. God intends to condemn those who do not love His
truth. That is what Paul is teaching in 2 Thessalonians 2:10-
“And he [Jesus] said, Therefore said I unto you, that no man can come unto me, except
it were given unto him of my Father. From that [time] many of his disciples went
back, and walked no more with him” (John 6:65-
Many of Christ’s professing “disciples” left Him on that occasion because they did not like what He had just preached to them. They did not want to hear the sovereignty of God in salvation taught. The Twelve, however, in reply to Christ’s inquiry (John 6:67), said, “Lord, to whom shall we go? thou hast the words of eternal life” (John 6:68). One cannot separate Christ from His truth.
So, then, what about the preacher who says, “Well, I believe in the doctrine of election, but I do not teach it or preach it.” Now, why does he not do so? Perhaps he fears offending or upsetting some dear soul?
But for those who are so cautious or fearful that they desire to bury predestination in order not to disturb weak souls—with what color will they cloak their arrogance when they accuse God indirectly of stupid thoughtlessness, as if he had not foreseen the peril that they feel they have wisely met? Whoever, then, heaps odium upon the doctrine of predestination openly reproaches God, as if he had unadvisedly let slip something hurtful to the church” (John Calvin, Institutes of the Christian Religion, V. 2, Book 3, Chapter 21, 926).
Is not the real reason a man does not preach election rather that he fears the departure of some of his “disciples”? He would rather avoid the angry and ugly reactions of some. Or perhaps he dreads being labeled a “Calvinist” and facing disfellowship from his friends?
What of the missionary who fears that he will lose his support if he embraces the truth?
Oh, but we have learned to justify ourselves in avoiding the truth and its consequences! We can remain “ignorant” of all the difficult doctrines by saying we would rather be practical than theological. We can just skip over and ignore those troublesome verses that deal with God’s sovereignty in salvation. We say, “Do not these verses belong to the secret things of God into which we are forbidden to inquire?” Now, are we not rather deceiving ourselves in order to avoid admitting to cowardice?
When a preacher takes the easy path, (1) he reproaches God for revealing these truths
that cause so much trouble (1 Corinthians 11:19); (2) he robs the saints of their
rightful food (Ephesians 4:11-
Thus, we ask, what right does any man have to pick and choose which parts of God’s revelation he will believe and teach? Paul is our example: “For I have not shunned to declare unto you all the counsel of God” (Acts 20:27).
CONCLUSION
Paul sets forth a very serious warning: Therefore, each one of us needs to take serious stock of our relationship to the truth (2 Corinthians 13:5). Do we love Christ? Do we love His truth? Do we love His truth no matter what it will cost us?
If we do, Christ exhorts us, “Fear none of those things which thou shalt suffer. . . be thou faithful unto death, and I will give thee a crown of life” (Revelation 2:10).
©1997, You may use any article we have for non-